Jaskier ♫ The Sandpiper (
rollstoseduce) wrote in
metaheroes2022-08-08 03:48 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
OurPowers | Text | Jaskier @buttercup | Public
Display Name: Jaskier @buttercup
Profile Photo: ♫
Notes: NSFW! Basically this post is a big Chuck Tingle joke (some images under the cut). But heads up! Jaskier's still amazed at the freedom this world's modern society has, so if your character asks him about his own world, please keep in mind that subjects of homophobia, fantasy racism, and censorship/book burning may come up. There's also an IC jab towards the church. I'm fine with teenagers tagging in, and any adult is free to threadjack to "protect" them (or threadjack in general, really, go nuts). (Also, blame Harry Osborn for this.)
Since my arrival in this realm, I've been nothing but (pleasantly!) astonished by the sexual freedom this so-called modern society prides itself on. Men openly flirt with me, women wear dresses that don't reach their knees, and there are entire stores dedicated to bawdy paraphernalia. The creativity is outstanding! I can access whole catalogs of these lewd movies in my pocket! Obscene songs play while you shop! Erotica is casually read during lunch breaks! Part of me is dying to know if there are priests out there with a forehead vein about to pop, but alas, to find out I would have to talk to them.
That said... the reason why I'm posting is to request clarification, mayhap for a social context I may lack. No matter how open-minded I may be, some things are still beyond my comprehension.

If someone can enlighten me by answering the simple question of what the fuck is this, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Profile Photo: ♫
Notes: NSFW! Basically this post is a big Chuck Tingle joke (some images under the cut). But heads up! Jaskier's still amazed at the freedom this world's modern society has, so if your character asks him about his own world, please keep in mind that subjects of homophobia, fantasy racism, and censorship/book burning may come up. There's also an IC jab towards the church. I'm fine with teenagers tagging in, and any adult is free to threadjack to "protect" them (or threadjack in general, really, go nuts). (Also, blame Harry Osborn for this.)
Since my arrival in this realm, I've been nothing but (pleasantly!) astonished by the sexual freedom this so-called modern society prides itself on. Men openly flirt with me, women wear dresses that don't reach their knees, and there are entire stores dedicated to bawdy paraphernalia. The creativity is outstanding! I can access whole catalogs of these lewd movies in my pocket! Obscene songs play while you shop! Erotica is casually read during lunch breaks! Part of me is dying to know if there are priests out there with a forehead vein about to pop, but alas, to find out I would have to talk to them.
That said... the reason why I'm posting is to request clarification, mayhap for a social context I may lack. No matter how open-minded I may be, some things are still beyond my comprehension.

If someone can enlighten me by answering the simple question of what the fuck is this, I'd greatly appreciate it.
@osborntobeking
it's a work of art, is what it is.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Text | ID: 2fast4U
If it exists, there is media using it in a sexualized manner.
no subject
But what is the purpose? At first, I thought it was all a huge jest, and while some of the images I'm seeing now under this "rule 34" header do indeed look like jokes, this writer is publishing actual erotica. With corn. A corn with a face on it!
no subject
But you're talking to someone who doesn't really get porn, so I have an obvious bias.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; @Sephiroth
no subject
[Attached: Tingle's works on Amazon and his Goodreads profile.]
no subject
I can recognize at least some of these as satire. Perhaps they are intended less as erotica and more as a means of ridicule.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: yennefer
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Text; un: Mysterio
no subject
no subject
The purpose here is merely to titillate - and this certainly makes them stand out and grab people's curiosity from the outrageous ideas.
It's genius.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Text | @timdrake
They're all referring to big news articles or political discourse, even though I don't think the concept of transitioning needs to have a discourse. Someone's just using them to make ridiculous, inexpensive erotica.
I'm not sure about the donuts and corn, and I'm not googling it.
Re: Text | @timdrake
hope this helps 🙂
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
display name: Otto Octavius | text
Why would you even put this here?
no subject
[Yeah, that was sarcasm.]
no subject
[He's joking, of course, but also MY GUY]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
un: Doreen Green
oh my gOD
OH MY GOD!!!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)